Monday, August 1, 2022

"L'Ami du peuple" and The Death of Marat

I can't stay away from my longstanding obsession with French culture. This week on The Charrette, I wrote about a painting that has held my attention captive since my college years. My art history professor told me about this painting sometime in 2011, and I was fascinated by the story of this journalist, Jean-Paul Marat, a French Revolutionary figure who was assassinated in his bathtub. Jaques-Louis David painted this as an ode to him — they were dear friends. You can see the words "À MARAT" inscribed on the crate next to his bathtub. 

Jaques Louis David's the death of marat à marat

It's so different than any of David's other paintings — which are so exacting, exciting and thrilling — that this one stands alone. It's so calm. Marat just looks like he's sleeping.

It wasn't until more recently that I realized how relevant Marat's story is to the turbulent and censorious world we live in now. He was a firebrand who threw his weight around via his newspaper, "L'Ami du peuple," to get people... canceled shall we say. Eventually, that came back to bite him when a young woman named Charlotte Corday had enough of his tirades and stabbed him in his bathtub. When you hear her tell it, she makes it sound rather justified.

I told the full story here this week as part of a four-part series on Marat. It's part of a bigger series on witch hunts throughout history and what we can learn from them — I encourage you to subscribe, so you can read all of them!

Some of these will be behind a paywall, but since you found me via my personal blog, here's a discount if you want to read the whole series.

Saturday, July 23, 2022

Fashion history can save the world

As promised, here's a preview of what I'm writing on The Charrette this week. And bonus, it actually had a little to do with fashion! (Mostly fashion history). 

Do you like the Bridgerton series on Netflix? Is Bridgerton historically accurate? I have some serious opinions on the costumes, and I'm not holding back. This is a paid article, but I'm giving you a free preview right here with even more info than what my free subscribers get

If you want to read the whole thing, head over to the article right now


Bonnets, Bridgerton & why we get history wrong

When reality is stranger — and more boring — than fiction.

A few months ago — like any self-respecting, fashion history-loving Jane Austenite — I hate-watched the entire second season of Bridgerton in 48 hours. It was terrible. I will be hate-watching season three.

I’m a bad person to watch historical dramas with because I spend most of the time fact-checking things on my phone and rolling my eyes, but Bridgerton season 2 was particularly bad [emphasis added emphatically].

The costumes looked like cheap prom dresses, and the story felt like an Austen fanfic written by a horse girl who had never seen the inside of a book. But one thing bothered me above all else: Almost every outdoor scene was shot in full sunlight, and all of the actors were giving this sultry look to the camera.

Bridgerton season two actors Benedict playing croquet Daphne Penelope Pen Kate Sharma are all looking into the camera in full sunlight and squinting. Bridgerton's costuming is terrible. The characters need hats and bonnets.

Do you know what would have fixed that? BONNETS AND HATS AND CAPS!

Directors of period dramas usually don’t use these because they aren’t sexy or “accessible” enough and can be hard to film. (But that didn’t stop Ang Lee from using it in his brilliant adaptation of Sense and Sensibility, did it? No.) Nevertheless, everyone — women in particular — always wore some sort of headwear — especially outdoors, so it would protect the delicate skin on their neck and face from the sun. It also kept them cooler since their skin wasn’t in the direct sunlight. Indoors, women would wear linen or cotton caps to keep their hair low maintenance and sometimes even indicate they were off the marriage market.

Regency fashion women in caps and bonnets. Did regency women wear bonnets? Why did women where caps in Jane Austen?

Revisionist history

I’m annoying to watch a period drama with, but it’s not because I’m a pedant or a purist. Okay, so that’s not the only reason. I do enjoy artistic interpretations of historical events. I liked the costume design in the first season of Bridgerton because it had such a clear point of view. However, I think that we view fictionalized events in books, film, and TV as the cold hard truth when it’s only an artistic interpretation. Ultimately, even though we’ve written these kinds of stories for centuries, the speed with which these stories are produced affects how we view ourselves in the present.

I once was talking to someone who mentioned how terrible it was Prince Philip had that affair with the famous ballet dancer Galina Ulanova and how he did Queen Elizabeth dirty by cheating on her. This was a storyline from Netflix’s The Crown, and they were stunned when I told them this wasn’t factual.

The chances of Prince Philip and Galina Ulanova having had an affair is slim, if at all possible. During her 1950s tour of Europe, she was 46 — eleven years older than Prince Philip. Furthermore, she was notoriously dedicated to her work and constantly meditating, rehearsing and reading about her roles, so she was probably too busy to have a dalliance with anyone, let alone a highly secret one with the husband of a figurehead of state. Although she was rumored to have been married several times over, it was also rumored she ultimately ended up with a woman at the end of her life — so there’s a possibility he may not have been her type anyway.

And this is mostly just a rumor. Of course, it could have been true, but little evidence exists to support it, and rumors spread like wildfire when a lack of real, verifiable information exists.

What was the biggest deterrent, however? She was from a hostile nation. Great Britain had been dealing with intense Soviet espionage since the 1930s, and Ulanova refused to even disembark her boat until she got the green light from Moscow — she made her allegiances clear before setting foot on English soil. British intelligence agencies would have been ALL over an affair between a possible Soviet spy and the spouse of a figurehead of state.

To some extent, we all take these nicely packaged narratives we see in pop culture as fact. We only have so much energy to dedicate to learning and remembering facts, and it’s easier when it’s served up in the form of an HBO miniseries. Although it’s fun to rewrite history for TV or a film by exaggerating juicy rumors, creating new characters or reorganizing a timeline, we risk losing touch with reality, ourselves and our future.

Doomed to Repeat the Past

We all know the adage that those who do not know the past are doomed to repeat it, but what of those who think they know the past? We live in an age filled with Twitter content, pop historians, news publications, and Wikipedia, all confidently asserting correctness on any given historical subject. We flock towards it, especially if it supports a narrative that confirms our worldview. Ultimately, it affects how we view politics, each other, and our future.

We prefer our watered-down, revised history for a few reasons:

#1 It makes things simple to understand.

If you take it at face value, revisionist history is salient and fascinating. Still, if you put even the tiniest bit extra effort into fact-checking, following up on timelines, archived news articles and read — dare I say — actual books, you’ll find context which adds complications making a story a lot harder to tell in one 50-minute episode. One of the most frustrating problems this poses to the modern viewer is that it makes it impossible to tell who the real heroes and villains are.

People love stories with a clear thesis with a beginning, middle and resolution, but life is messy, and history is complicated. No one’s life has a thesis or a “moral to the story.” Unless you are one of the blessed few who seem to turn everything they touch into gold (in which case, thank you for reading my Substack, Dolly Parton), most of us are just bumbling through life.


Soon after this section, I put up a paywall, but I'll give you a sneak peek as to what's behind it. I talk about four different reasons we believe in revisionist history and give the reality of the matter. Here's what we cover...

#1 It makes things simple to understand.

Revisionist history makes it easy to figure out who the heroes and villains are. Real history shows us how complicated people (including us) are.

#2 It makes us feel virtuous.

Revisionist history makes us feel righteous and good. Real history reveals that we are, indeed, as stupid and wicked as people in the past... or maybe they are just as smart as we are.

#3 It’s WAY more interesting than the truth.

Revisionist history makes it seem like there was intrigue and adventure at every turn. Real history is mostly just working-class people keeping fires going, chopping wood and avoiding dysentery.

#4 It makes make us feel safe.

Revisionist history makes us feel like we have control over our future and nothing bad will ever happen. Real history hits us with the existential truth that sometimes freak accidents just happen.

I talk about Bridgerton, The Crown and Under the Banner of Heaven too. You can read the whole thing here. And just because you are an old follower of my blog from my blogger days, here's a 50% off discount for a paid subscription. ;)

Or subscribe for free here: 

Friday, July 22, 2022

Fashionably out of fashion

Corgi dog looking up at owner. Cute dog. Cute corgi. Sparkly converse sneakers. Pembroke Welsh Corgi.

Hey, friends! It has been a while, hasn't it? Did you miss me?

I realize I haven't posted here for some time, but I want you to know I am still writing — just not here. My Blogger bio said, "Loves art. Loves fashion. Loves writing. Loves traveling. Trying to combine them into a career." I may have not combined all of those things into a career, but I have figured out a lot since the last time I posted here. 

  • First off, as much as I still love sewing, fashion and clothing, I no longer want to go into fashion design. 
  • I still love art, but being an artist almost sounds more painful than just enjoying it. 
  • I love traveling... but Covid and being an adult kind of got in the way of that, didn't it?
I recently lost my job (story about it here), and it gave me a lot of time to think about what I really want to do with my life. I had always enjoyed writing and recently found a platform that I really enjoy working on. I also realized I wanted more flexibility with my own life and to have more decision-making power over my future. After a great deal of thought and prayer, I decided it might be time to take the plunge and become a freelancer — an idea I had already considered for a few years. 

I actually started a new publication called The Charrette which you can read more about here

What is a charrette?

Historically, the word “charrette,” meaning "cart," was used by the École des Beaux-Arts in France. It referred to the student's method of working late into the night before their initial projects and drafts were due and a cart would come around and pick them up. Later, their professors would go on to give them critiques and feedback. 

In today's terminology, you usually see a "design charrette" in civil engineering or at design agencies. In this process, they get a group of a few people with different specialties (for example, an engineer, a designer, a marketer, etc.) to problem solve and come up with a solution that no one of them could have devised on their own. 

The Charrette's motto is, "Where art, history, politics, & public opinion meet." I guess I wasn't finding a way to roll all my passions into one career, so I had to take charge and do that myself. 

What is a design charrette? What is a charrette? What does charrette mean in English? Is charrette a French word?

So, Kathleen — what do you write about nowadays?

I'm still working on finding my perfect niche, but I love exploring the interlocking connections between history, art and modern life. Having spent probably too much of my career in social media, I realize that so many of us have lost touch with reality. I feel that art and history have a lot to teach us in the way of empathy and can create important context for our lives. 

What are some of the best things you have written recently?

Before I set off on this journey, I actually worked for a performing arts organization, and I wrote some pretty great things for them like this piece and this piece. I also created a few great videos for them that challenged my writing skills like this one and this one.

Before I left, I got the rights to publish an interview I did with Steven Osbourne, an incredible Scottish pianist and interpreter of Sergei Rachmaninoff. I will probably try and continue to include more artist interviews in the future, but for now, I have a few other projects I want to work on. 

I also republished the piece "The Black Dog: How to Talk about Suicide" on The Charrette. I made some much-needed updates. The meat of the piece is very much the same, but I have changed so much, that I needed to share the lessons I learned as I grew over the last four years.

Let me tell you what I'm most excited about...

The stuff I have been writing recently has me excited about life again. I was in a slump for so long, but I have felt a new lease on life and a new burst of creativity! Here are the pieces I have been the happiest with — and some projects I'm excited about working on. 

First off, in addition to starting freelance work, I got a part-time gig with the Deseret News, an up-and-coming regional newspaper. I'm writing a daily newsletter called Utah Today, which you can subscribe to here. I've always wanted to learn more about journalism and get that experience — I'm really grateful for the opportunity.

Over the last year or so, I have become increasingly concerned with how people view the world and whether or not they construct their own "truth."  A lot of what I've been exploring is how we perceive rhetoric — for example, I wrote a post on Marie Antoinette's famous-yet-fake "let them eat cake" line and how these rumors affect the way we view politics today.

That post, and a serendipitous post from the American Bar Association, led me to write a post about the Salem Witch Trials called "The Devil You Know." I was so fascinated by this subject, that I decided I wanted to write even more about it. It has been a while since I have written on The Charrette, but rest assured that I am doing research to post the best possible work I can produce. 

And of course, in the meantime, I have fun posts like this one, and I'm not afraid of a little controversy. I'll probably crosspost the occasional thing over here, but I'd still love to see you over at The Charrette.

I would love it if you followed me and subscribed. Sign up below, and keep up with my writing.